5/17/2023 0 Comments Qupzilla java![]() ![]() On top of all of this, QupZilla's interface is clean and attractive. QupZilla is an alternative browser that, while not being a contender to take the place of the big browsers out there, certainly offers a good amount of interesting features, giving potential users many reasons to consider it. By clicking on that, you're on that page. When you open a new tab, you will see miniature versions of your favorite web pages inside of it. UCWEB/2.0(Java U MIDP-2.0 xx samsung-gt-s3653) U2/1.0.0. The browser comes with some interesting features, such as Adblock, which blocks all unwanted ads from certain web pages, or an integrated RSS feed, letting the user view things that interest them quickly and easily.Īnother helpful feature is 'Speed Dial', giving the user much faster access to their most visited web pages. The fact that QupZilla uses WebKit means that it is benefitting from the same technology as browsers such as Google Chrome, giving the user fast page loading and a fast browsing experience. However, in spite of this we continue to see some interesting alternatives such as QupZilla, which is based on a WebKit core and Qt Framework. That was an oversight on my behalf.Competition between web browsers is becoming more and more fierce. The V1.8.9 currently on repo is really kind of stale as it was released Nov 11, 2015. Would be nice if they upgraded to a version 2 or falkon (Version 3). Why don't you use IE5.5SP2 but IE5.5SP1 ?Īpologies - I actually do use IE 5.5-SP2. March 2018 - light & fast.on my old tank of a machine. ![]() 2013) is more secure than Firefox 12.0 (Apr. Although I assume you need some sort of Kernel Extension application, the Windows 2K equivalent of "KernelX"?įirefox 12 and IE5.5 SP1 work just fine for me :-) To be honest, I hadn't considered that, and I didn't realise they actually worked. At this point in time, FF3.65.28 is automatically downloading FF12, the last for Windows 2K - so I'm looking forward to slightly better website display - but there is a speed reduction, I imagine. It is also a heck of a lot faster than the newer versions of IE, though Firefox on this machine is a tad sluggish. IE 5.5 SP1 also works surprisingly well for its age, and can display most websites fairly well still. ![]() Personally, I've found that Firefox 3.6.28 works and is still very usable on all sites - I was even using this on my school computer until a user-privileges error led to the re-installation of Windows XP Pro (Firefox was apparently only "interim" before they made the upgrade in 2012 to IE8 or IE9. In case of my main PC with 8GB of RAM I can install a dozen of different extensions, browse tens of websites at the same time and still have a lot of RAM left but on the laptop the only extension installed is AdBlock. What helps is to keep only 1-3 tabs open at once and not install extensions which also tend to use a lot of memory. The real problem is that the so called "modern" websites themselves use a lot of RAM and the browser can't really do a lot to help in this matter. Even on such a machine they work pretty well and browsing is smooth. I've got an older laptop with Pentium III-M 933MHz / 640MB RAM and I use the newest versions of both Firefox and Chrome on it. All browsers based on Chromium have the Javascript bug which (at least for me) makes them unusable in 2K. If you don't like it then Qupzilla (which you're already using) is fine. As long as it's not a very old computer I'd just use the newest versions of web browsers.įor Windows 2000 I recommend Firefox. You're probably going to encounter plenty of website incompatibility issues when using older browsers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |